Re: etc.

[kevin benjamin <kbenj@shore.net>]

On Sun, 20 Nov 1994, Philip C. Hart wrote:

> 
> The lack of .DWG translation and upgraded graphics drivers were (barely)
> tolerable two and three years ago when the "Windows Product" was "6 to 9
> months away."  Today, it is ludicrous.
> 
> Cadkey has much to be commended for.  But if they expect to hold and
> build upon the user base that they have "grown" in the last year, I think
> that they have to recognize that that user base must be fed with some
> substance.
> 
	...and he expresses my feelings perfectly.  Granted the 
difficulty involved in developing a Windows product, or a 
database/reference file system, the VERY LEAST we can expect would be 
that CADKEY would address and satisfy these two complaints.

	I think we can wait for windows.  But I think it is more than 
ludicrous to ignore .dwg - it is a sign of a company that isn't really 
serious about being recognised by the architectural CAD market.

	KB